17 weeks
Delivery timeline
50+
Experts interviewed
NGO
Client type
Strategy
Project type

The challenge

Request

Our client, a major philanthropic organization, wanted to identify which novel post-harvest technologies to invest in to reduce food loss of nutrient-dense foods in selected low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The key question was which novel, not-yet-widely-tested technologies could realistically work under LMIC constraints such as weak cold chain, fragmented aggregation, infrastructure limitations, and varying regulatory environments. The objective was to move from a broad landscape of possible interventions to a prioritized portfolio of technologies and actionable pathways for deployment.

approach

Our 4 phase approach

Delivered in four phases, over 17 weeks:

1. Food prioritization

Built a long list of nutrient-dense foods across priority countries based on nutritional relevance, production scale, and post-harvest loss levels.

2. Technology prioritization

Screened over 50 post-harvest and processing technologies, assessing relevance to the priority foods and LMIC deployment conditions, and narrowed the long list to roughly 20 high-potential technologies for deeper assessment.

3. Detailed technology assessment

Combined desk research with provider interviews, expert input, and validation to identify the top six technologies with the strongest feasibility-adjusted impact on food loss reduction, quantifying impact on food loss reduction, shelf-life extension, relevance to priority foods, and technical, economic, and social/regulatory feasibility across the target countries.

4. Deployment pathways

Assessed where and how the priority technologies could be deployed across the four target countries and value chains, defined key barriers, enabling conditions, and catalytic actions needed for piloting, de-risking, and scale-up, and quantified business cases to show where deployment can be commercially viable.

Results

Technology assessment results

Figure 1: Technology assessment results – 6 technologies best positioned to reduce FLW and thus increase food availability at scale – anonymized BGP assessment

Figure 2: Country-level impact for one of the priority technologies showing annual loss reduction in kilotons of food per country – anonymized BGP assessment

Client impact

A decision-ready roadmap

The final deliverables equipped the client with a clear, evidence-based view of which post-harvest technologies offer the strongest pathway to reducing food loss and improving the availability of nutrient-dense foods in LMICs.

Key deliverables included:

  • A prioritized portfolio of six complementary technologies best suited to LMIC realities, balancing impact potential with technical, economic, and social feasibility.
  • Population-level impact estimates showing how the technologies bridge nutrient gaps for millions of people.
  • Deployment recommendations, defining where and how the technologies can be deployed across countries and value chains, including pilot and validation priorities, viable business models, de-risking actions, financing strategy, enabling conditions, and pathways to scale.

As a result, the client gained a roadmap for where to focus investment, which technologies to validate first, and how to play an impactful role in de-risking deployment and enabling long-term scale. The findings also identified the most viable business models for the prioritized technologies, clarifying how they can operate and create value.

Exploring novel agrifood technologies?

Talk through your investment or deployment strategy with our team.

See a sample output

Download an example of how a BGP report looks.

Ready for Bright Green Partners support?

Our consulting team based out of Europe and 2500+ expert team located in 60+ countries cover the full AgriFood Tech value chain globally.

Naomi Kelliher
Project Manager